BloodyNinja's Profile

X-Force fights a jungle. Again. I feel like I'm watching jumanji, these plots are so boring.

I saw this issue here 3 times and I rate it 10 here 3 times.

Pretty okay issue. Way better than Brisson's stories about Beak's father or Glob Herman and his chickens preaching sermons.

A repeated book is not worth any rating at all.

as usual, the same user, using several different accounts, is reviewing this title and rating it 1.0... though in this particular case I'd rate it 10 all the same, sometimes I just rate it high because many reviews just rate it the minimum score just to troll... instead of being honest and trying to make this platform reliable, they troll and spoil it, too bad

perfect

I've never seen a comic book being swipped. Art's beautiful, but the issue itself is the most UNCREATIVE thing I've ever seen, a dumb copy.

Aaron should take easy on all this jesting... Ice Age Man is just... ugh.

I'd never expect that one of the most amazing X-Men stories were going to be told under a the title "Marauders".

The only reason I'm not rating it 10 is Greg Land's "art".

This was probably the best Dawn of X's issue so far. Concerning the art, when does Leinil Yu's art work? In a story in which most of the panels consist of people speaking on a table in a white room. Particularly, I hate Yu's style nowadays, it's poor and ugly in most scenes. But it works here. The text is splendid, and each character has unique and precise moments and lines. The way Magneto's speech relates to adaptation and a silent economic war is amazing. In one issue we have an interesting subjacent concept, character development, and an interesting and complete story. The downside is that Hickman rarely delivers a good action sequence... Cyclops' moments are kind of lame when compared to action scenes from other current X-books for instance. And we don't even see the so lethal Gorgon fighting.

This book is a delirium by the author. I'm happy to know it got cancelled.

I don't care if Hickman is a visionary architect or some kind of worldbuilding mastermind who conceives the most brilliant plots and ideas. That is irrelevant when the text is poorly written and the pacing of the story has problems. Moreover, the humour is lousy, stupid... and not funny at all. As in previous issues, the art is not good. Thus, a book with almost NO AESTHETICAL QUALITY. He might promise the most ingenious stories, so what? The reading experience is unworthy.

This is a very sloppy comic book issue, and I'm pretty sure the Selkies scene is the worst scene ever conceived for a comic book. Tini Howard is incompetent, simple as that. The text is weird and repetitive. The same line is found in 4 or 5 different moments of the issue. For instance, Gambit says he's not in the mood for jokes many times, and Betsy does the same when she repeatedly refuses Apocalypse's help. Betsy's powerset is the one of the most horrendously treated things in the book. The Selkies try to kill the group, ok. Then, Betsy jumps into the sea, and swims to shore, faster than the killer mermaids. Then, she climbs a rock and is safe. Soon after that, she is followed by Gambit and Jubilee. Only then, she realises she can use her telekinesis [?] to get Rogue. (I'm not even going to criticise that Betsy having telekinetic powers is stupid, Remender knew that). Meanwhile, Kate suddenly disappears for no reason. Captain Britain's uniform should act as an antenna to channel the energies of the Otherworld. I don't care what powers these are, Howard's free to do her thing. But something that annoys the hell out of me is that the author doesn't care about defining basic things for the characters, such as their powers. Apocalypse for example uses bursts of energy while wearing a robe. Imagine if you're a new reader. You have no idea on what are the abilities of the main characters. They're super-heroes, having powers is their thing. Otherwise, Meggan and Jamie, for example, don't seem to care about the disappearance of their husband and brother. Neither do they show up in the book, nor does Morgana, THE FUCKING VILLAIN FOR THE STORY. However, the worst of the worst is the text itself. The characters are obnoxious, rude... not sympathetic AT ALL. None of them. Apocalypse is the most charismatic one, and that's bad. Moreover, the text is hard to appreciate, the infographics are useless, pure gibberish. This is Dawn of X's worst book. It saddens me that the author was hired in an exclusive contract. DISAPPOINTING.

there are no words to describe PERFECTION

This is basically one of the worst retcons I've ever read in any comic book. It's almost as bad as Sins Past. And the text is sooooo badly written. You don't take the random effect out of a character's origin and make it premeditated without severe consequences, and they tend to bad. But in Captain Marvel's case it's so awful, it's even hard to criticise this decision since it's so ill-conceived.

I've read 5 issues of this garbage in a row and the only feeling I have is hate.

I was going to rate it 9 because the art is not good, but haters are forcing me to rate it 10. _o_

Finally we return to our regularly schedule programming. I thought X-Men: Gold could get better, but oh boy I was wrong.

It is good, but it can only get a 7 with this terrible art.

This is the best current Marvel series undoubtedly. I'm trembling since I read this issue.

In this comic, thing simply happen with no reason at all. Stormcaster enters in the narrative without any previouse plot, it just enters. And the villain is extremely obscene.

This is the worst X-Men comic book ever made. I have shame for Greg Pak when I read it. It's bad in all possible levels.