fthissite's Profile

Did you really call her "it". You're a huge piece of shit.

Did you even read what I wrote???? Love that you jump this. TBH I knew someone like you would. You may as well say "You called someone an asshole??? How dare you you?" Do you understand context? Do you even know what was said? You're a moron but I guess for people like you it can't go both ways right? Trans people are not some protected species immune from insult.

My girlfriend is trans and if she said something like this pos said I'd first break up then call her the same thing. Calling someone who doesn't agree with you a nazi is pretty insulting too but that's ok. Fact is arguing with a POS like you never gets anywhere so or solves anything because your immune to change....which is pretty conservative thinking now that I think about it. Anyhow I'm done. Rant away.

I'm sure your girlfriend would love to know that her basic validity and humanity is contingent on whether or not she agrees with you.

So you deliberately used "it" as an insult. With a trans girlfriend. Okay bud.

He supported Nazis. He was supported by Nazis. He carried Nazi ideals. He was a Nazi. Why don't you tell your girlfriend you called another trans person "it" because they said something you disagreed with and THEN tell them that you'd do that same to them if they had said it. See how that works out for you.

"Everyone I don't like is a Nazi"

Sad nazis make me happy.

I think you need to understand what hate speech is. What Gretchen said is not hate speech. What Choo Choo Charles said many times was dangerously close to hate speech which is why the people who actually use it liked him so much.

It's curious that you consider everything from wokeness to be a flop while also insisting people are woke for the sake of profit in other reviews. Also, do your research. Gretchen was a total edgelord who didn't just suddenly say something controversial, which is another reason her firing is suspect. DC had to have known. Charlie Kirk wasn't just a little guy either. He was instrumental in the hate that many people in America now face. He was instrumental in the rise of this Trumpian fascism.

If Jesus were around, he'd have found Charlie and those like him disgraceful. If the gospel were real, there's no doubt Charlie's burning in eternal hellfire right now. He was a propagandist who served the worst of humanity and his wife and friends aren't even sad that he's gone. His corpse is yet another grifting opportunity for these vultures, and I'm sure Charlie would be proud to be another tool.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvgZtdmyKlI "Everyone I don't like is a Nazi" No, Nazis are Nazis. Kirk was Nazi scum, and the world is better for every dead Nazi.

Would like to point out that fthissite essentially self-reported on the Nazi front. He brought it up completely out of nowhere. No one called him a Nazi or even insinuated that. I just called him a POS for intentionally misgendering a trans woman with the term, "it". That might be your smoking gun...

Sorry buddy. You missed the rapture. I'm SURE they missed you.

Anyone who's been on here a while & mainly through the years of insanity where Hex & his ilk ran rampant with the virtue signaling (woke if you want to call it that) nonsense can recall the use of the nazi word they constantly brought up.I didn't bring it up out of nowhere pal. Besides inflation, their stupidity was a main factor in the cheetos mans return. Congrats guys. #TRONWASRIGHT.

Charlie Kirk was horrible but so are Hex, psychamorean, chuckturds and sad comics. Your all just sensitive man children who have no integrity, just the illusion of it. Fuck you all. Adios.

Bro you've been here a year. It literally says Oct 1, 2024. You haven't seen me for "years". On top of that, I took time off for a long while. I hadn't posted anything for almost a year myself really until USM had come out. What are you even talking about? Virtue signaling is bad and that's why the Annoying Orange is still here but calling out Nazis is a bad thing and that's NOT why we're heading towards an authoritarian regime. Okay. You're a centrist fence sitter. How's that for integrity?

You can comb through all of my reviews and comments and not find a single instance of me calling someone a Nazi other than CK. I didn't even call fthissite one. This guy was full of crap the entire time. There was no virtue signaling coalition conspiracy. Like and level minded people were calling POS like this man out for being POSs. The true man child left the chat, crying as he went.

Most of these characters have been around for a decade if not longer. Araña is like a 25 year old character at this point.

??? And? Your comment has nothing to do with what he said.

If you like these characters, Toonstack, please don't let my review take away your enjoyment.

It just seems like you're not actually reviewing the book but the concept of spider characters. Thats what's kinda throwing me But to each their own I guess

Can you really separate the concept from the story? The cover is explicitly playing with the concept, and the fact that those are alternative "Spider-Men" matters to the story. You can't just take them out and have the same story. I also mentioned the art, that I don't like.

I guess the only aspect I left out because I wanted to keep it short and focused on my main issues, is Osborn as Spider-Man. I don't think it's a particularly great idea, but it gives us the opportunity for the cosmic Spider-Man stories drawn by Pepe Larraz, which are much more interesting to me. It's a shame that the series cannot focus on one storyline and one artist.

I agree the use of "they" over and over, took me right out of the story - especially when Han could tell that the assassin was a female.

Yep, and this is the first time I have seen Segura do this in his writing. Very strange choice. Espeicailly for this scene.

How is using the term "they" altering the English language? It is literally a word in that language. It works perfectly in the context of when it was being used. It is used every day for millions of people non-discerning of gender. It's not a political statement. Why is that problematic or is it just something that confuses small boomer brains who can't spell "especially", especially well?

I'm not even responding to the stupidity of your response. Please stop conmmenting on my posts. Block me or something.

What part of MY response was stupid over your own review? Answer me those questions I presented and I will gladly stay away from your posts.

What question? The English language (and all others throughout the world) state that word "They" regards multiple poeple not a solitary individual. I, for one, will not be altering the traditional version of the English language. Now go away.

The term "they" has also been used for a long, long time to refer to someone of an unspecified gender. One example could be "are they a boy or a girl?" Yes, "they" can refer to multiple people as a group, but it, just like many other words, has more than one use.

The first documented use of "they" in reference to a singular noun was in the 1300s per Oxford English Dictionary. And I say people like fzanca making these reviews ought to return to tradition like the rest of us.

They can mean a single individual - "They are over there". For gods' sakes you're supposed to be a writer! I also love how you edited that comment and not your own previous misspelling. But a deal is a deal, however poorly you defended your veiled bigotry, bye now! #neflix

They can be used where the gender of the individual is unknown but if it's known then it's plural. Martin says the assassin was clearly female so it probably shouldn't have been used but some feel it's offensive to assume someones gender because a few believe gender is a choice. Stupid sounding to me but it's newer belief and each generation believes their way is the right way. If it takes you out of the story or not is just how you feel but it's not really bigotry. CALM.

"They can be used where the gender of the individual is unknown but if it's known then it's plural." this is just made up.

I guess you can google it. It has been changed RECENTLY to include nonbinary people as well because of all the uproar from certain people but until the last few years it didn't. Calling one person they is kinda the new made up thing here. Not really a big deal just true. As I said, things change and each generation makes new rules but you can't just change the past or the truth. I guess you can say traditionally it's true if it makes you feel better about it.

Anyway, this is all I'll say about it. Feel any way anyone wants it'll never be good enough. I'm done commenting or doing anything other than scoring comics. I see the same ol' faces on this site are still doing the same ol' thing and it's tiresome.

But I did Google it. Shakespeare used a singular they to refer to a man. It goes back that far. It's not something new and it's not about making new groups feel better about it. You're just wrong and clearly, your feelings are tied to that wrongness. May as well type out "sigh" while you're at it.

Nice I loved Immortal Thor so I think Ill like this one but have alot of comics Im catching up on first