HauntinGrounds's Profile

Truly insightful. This is someone who believes in a conspiracy theory called Cultural Marxism. This is a far-right anti-semitic conspiracy theory that states there is a concerted effort to subvert and undermine western and traditional Christian values. Don't believe me? Look, he says so himself: https://imgur.com/Y2uvqkY Oh, and google Cultural Marxism. The wikipedia article is very helpful!

Rasiel posted a brain-dead take: "The author's introduction celebrates that the characters presented in this anthology "are no longer defined by who they are.” What an accurate depiction of wokism: it doesn't matter who you are as an individual, all that matters is how your race, gender, or sexual orientation can be used to facilitate divisiveness."

First, the introduction was written by Marc Andreyko, who doesn't have any stories in this anthology. Second, what he means is that these characters are three-dimensional. They aren't just trotted out by DC for a cheap, cynical cashgrab anthology. They exist in the universe and in plenty of stories, and they are not just the stereotypes that we're all so used to seeing.

Anyone who actually uses the term "wokeism" (misspelled by Rasiel to be different, I can only assume) is already very far gone. But no, progressivism and an awareness of social justice issues does not turn individuals into one-dimensional identifiers meant to facilitate divisiveness. Progressivism is all about inclusion, the exact opposite of what Rasiel is saying. But what do you expect from an honest to god idiot, who liked reviews openly condemning homosexuality as degeneracy?

I don't have a screencap of that, because it was removed. Darn. But I did comment on their review about it!

And lastly, Briton: "Blatant propaganda-mongering from DC. This sort of drivel will kill off the comics industry." I think I covered all of this above. So, let's do as we should always, and ignore the British. (That's a joke, I don't have anything against the British. The idea is that it's so absurd and that's what makes it funny.)

"You guys need to be releasing this book in the Middle East, thats where they actually have a problem with intolerance towards LGBT". Based on the comments of you and other people like you, it's quite obvious that intolerance against LGBT people doesn't just exist in the Middle East.

That's Tynion for you, man, he doesn't care about the story as long as he scores one for the twitter crowd. :))

Well, if you weren't a total idiot, you'd know the train derailed because of a bomb explosion that destroyed the bridge the train was on. But I guess it's too much to ask homophobes to read properly.

What bomb? It is not mentioned in this story. You're just imagining things and using it as a weapon to attack people.

First, they weren't having sex in the book, they just had their shirts off. Second, the bomb is a part of Scott's history. It's literally his origin. There was a bomb used to sabotage the bridge by Albert Dekker. As a Green Lantern fan you would think that you'd know that. Alan has trauma. His love died in an accident that was NOT caused by their love or even remotely his fault. But clearly you are just homophobic and don't care.

First, they were clearly having sex in the book. You must be blind if you didn't see it. Second, Alan's origin story was clearly changed in this story, otherwise he won't be gay. So why should I consider the unmentioned bomb should exist here? Third, oh you think I'm homophobic because I don't like a badly written story? Whatever, call the police to arrest me.

Just going to put this out there. It's kind of hard for two men to have sex with their pants still on. Which they had. They were just making out. So you're wrong there. Just brushing off the fact that him being gay has nothing to do with the bombing? Because you blamed their having sex, which didn't happen on the bomb that you neglected to remember about his origin. And finally. Yes you are a homophobe. You wouldn't even deny it.