Wonder Woman #792

You mean to tell me that you went back months on my reviews and all you could find was a review where I know I'm in the wrong and kept it up anyway because I've got some sort of integrity? Why don't you look at other reviews of mine for this very title where I give issues mediocre or even downright bad ratings?

I have been very open about Wonder Woman being a character that bores me with plenty of reviews about how bad her book has been for nearly 5+ years. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.

But you're incapable of understanding the most basic of nuance, which is why you couldn't comprehend the in-your-face, screaming lunatic politics of V for Vendetta and outted yourself as moron

He's a bigot because of his other reviews, of which we've both seen plenty. What you see here is me making a bad assumption based on loads of evidence but cruxing it on this specific piece of, what turned out to be, not evidence. Hence my unapologetic tone in the correction. I was wrong in this instance, yes, but there are plenty of other instances where I'm not. I didn't just pick his name out of a hat at random.

I can't remember who I got called out by, if I did at all. The funniest thing about the banning stuff is I know exactly who was working with Dan to get people off the site and they are no longer active on the site themselves. This conspiracism is so unfounded, so lazy, so stupid. I literally have nothing to hide here.

I feel like I could stare at a blank wall, pick a random comic, and review it with a random string of words and ideas, and still be called more attentive than you. I've never considered myself an SJW, but the label doesn't bother me. Bullying is fine when it's done to people who simply use their reviews to hate on creators and their work.

Oh, he's definitely review bombing. He goes out of his way to only rate things he doesn't like, and also his justification most of the time may as well not exist because it adds nothing.

Btw, the issue with SJWs was often how overzealous they were, not that they were wrong. If you think I'm being priggish for not being nice towards people who don't deserve it, you may be a snowflake.

Is having any sort of axiom considered being priggish? I have some moral principles that I use to guide what's right or wrong. So does everyone else. If I think someone is being harmful, it's perfectly okay for me to say something, as goes for everyone else.

You're basically trying to get at me for not foregoing my principles for the sake of strangers online liking me more. I don't think there's room to budge on a lot of these issues.